Compare the work of Andre Kertesz and Henri Cartier-Bresson versus the work of Eugene Smith and Sebastio Salgado. They are photojournalist with different approaches.
What are the main differences and similarities?
Differences: Andre Kertesz and Henri Cartier-Bresson think their photographs should leave as which they took them as, staying ture to the term reality. Andre Kertesz and Henri Cartier-Bresson are the of the photographer are invisible of the photographer, they believed that photographs should be invisible and only be seen as doing their works. However, Eugene Smith and Salgado are the visibility of the photographer. Both of them are photojournalists that took pictures in order to influence people, and they shoot the truth about World issues affect to the public.
Similarities: The similarities between the work of Andre Kertesz and Henri Cartier-Bresson versus the work of Eugene Simith and Sebastio Salgado are that all of them have high passionate about photography, and four of them want to show their pictures to the public. What’s more they are all well known photographers that have great contributed to the world of photography.
What's the better journalistic approach?
In my opinion, the better journalistic approach would be Andre Ketesz and Henri Cartier-Bresson. The reason that they have better journalistic approach because their photos are natural and reality. It is very important to capture images in the real or raw situations and left untouched. In addition, they believed that photographers must not influence their photos by their emotions. On the other hand, Eugene Smith and Sebastio salgado they edited their photos to reflect their own emotions to influence public.
Reference:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kertesz_The_Fork.jpg
http://artblart.com/2011/02/04/exhibition-andre-kertesz-at-jeu-de-paume-paris/
http://abduzeedo.com/classic-photography-henri-cartier-bresson